Carl Icahn, Stephen Sweeney Go At It Over Atlantic City’s Gambling Future

Carl Icahn accuses brand New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney of attempting to sell out Atlantic City by supporting a north Jersey casino.

Business Carl that is mogul Icahn New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney exchanged harsh words last Friday, with each accusing the other of selling out some portion of Atlantic City for their very own gain. The war of words started after Sweeney took part in protests with union workers from the Trump Taj Mahal, protests of which Icahn proved to be a major target.

Those protests were designed to fight back against a Trump Entertainment plan to break out of a contract and cut pensions and benefits for workers in order to cut costs and keep the casino open as we reported earlier this week.

The company states that the casino will have to close on November 13 unless numerous concessions are granted to it, including the cutbacks in worker benefits and $25 million in help from hawaii, along with a reduced taxation assessment.

Workers Blame Icahn

But Icahn turned out to be a major figure in the protests. The protesters demonstrated near the Tropicana, that will be owned by a group led by Icahn, and numerous see him as the true threat to the advantages and wages offered by their current positions. In bankruptcy court, Trump Entertainment has required permission to turn over its venue to Icahn by converting the financial obligation he holds in the company into ownership of the casino. Icahn says he would then be willing to invest another $100 million into the Taj Mahal, but only when his concessions are granted.

Sweeney reacted for this by saying that there ended up being no method their state would contribute to the transfer that is proposed Icahn, and sharply criticized the investor’s plan for the casino.

‘he wants, he’s closing anyway,’ Sweeney said if he doesn’t get everything. ‘But if he is able to get all this money from the taxpayers and the workers, he then’ll make an investment in the property.’

Sweeney had been just one of a few politicians from both major parties whom criticized Icahn’s proposal at a Boardwalk press conference.

‘You get nothing you treat workers with respect and dignity,’ Sweeney said from us until.

Icahn Fires Back

But Icahn ended up being ready to fire straight back at Sweeney and other state officials that have criticized him while also proposing that casinos be built in north Jersey.

‘Sweeney is selling out Atlantic City to New that is northern Jersey the one hand, and now he’s telling all these workers in Atlantic City that Carl Icahn would be to blame, when I’m the only one that took a risk with $80 million when nobody else would,’ Icahn said. ‘ On the one hand, we are to believe Senator Sweeney is Atlantic City’s defender that is staunchest, yet on the other hand, the same Senator Sweeney is off in north Jersey making plans allowing gaming outside of the latest York City, a concession which could mean the end of gaming in Atlantic City.’

Sweeney appears in US District Court on this week so that they can get a judge to force the concessions he’s got asked for, while the state and Atlantic City have to date rejected his terms.

Trump Entertainment is also hoping that a Delaware bankruptcy court allows it to end the union contract that is current. The company is accusing the workers’ union of sacrificing 3,000 jobs at the Taj Mahal in an effort to protect workers at other casinos, as under the union contract, any concessions won at one casino would be allowed at other Atlantic City casinos also.

UK Gambling Act Challenge by GBGA Snuffed by London High Court

London’s High Court ruled against a GBGA challenge towards the new UK Gambling Act, letting it be implemented month that is next. (Image:

Great britain Gambling Act goes into impact next thirty days after a challenge from the Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association (GBGA) was rejected by the High Court a week ago. The appropriate challenge had currently been successful in delaying the execution of the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act from October 1 to November 1, nevertheless the ruling means the legislation will be enforced as anticipated.

‘I have always been for the conclusion that parliament was well within its rights to act because it did,’ stated Lord Justice Nicholas Green.

GBGA Fails to Make Its Case

In their ruling, Green said that the GBGA failed to exhibit that the new regulations would be unlawful under the laws of either the UK or the European Union. He also rejected a plan that is alternate by the GBGA, a so-called ‘passporting’ plan, that would enable the GBGA to maintain complete certification control over its operators while agreeing to share data utilizing the British Gambling Commission (UKGC).

The ruling means that all online gambling operators who want to conduct business with customers in britain will need to hold a permit with the gambling payment here by November 1. This won’t be a challenge for most companies that wanted to stay in the united kingdom, as most believed which they would require to apply for a license by October 1.

The changes that are real come into play on December 1. That’s whenever a brand new point-of-consumption tax will be implemented in great britain on licensed operators. This will imply that all operators can pay a 15 % income tax on their revenues derived from UK customers, regardless of where they are headquartered or what taxes they may pay in their home nations.

GBGA Still Has Concerns

The UKGC ended up being happy aided by the decision, as the organization not just beat right back the challenge, but was granted £100,000 ($159,400) to cover for its legal costs.

‘We welcome this judgment and that can now finish preparations for implementation of the Act on 1 November,’ the UKGC composed in a declaration.

Conversely, the GBGA expressed its disappointment with the court’s decision.

‘ Cross-border regulatory regimes require significant co-ordination and co-operation on key appropriate and regulatory issues and the UK already had this utilizing the Gibraltar industry, regulator and jurisdiction,’ the GBGA said following the ruling. ‘ We maintain this statutory legislation isn’t in the best interests of consumers, the industry and the regulator itself and that you can find more effective means of dealing with the challenges of regulation and competition in this sector.’

The GBGA also stated that it may be time for European officials to come up having an overarching framework for online gambling.

‘We remain concerned the united kingdom regulator will see it difficult to hold organizations to account in jurisdictions not in the EU where it doesn’t have legal powers and typical framework that is legal culture,’ the Association statement stated. ‘Given this judgment there is now even greater significance of an EU legal framework for online gambling if we are to effectively protect all European consumers, enjoy a common market and avoid each member state deciding alone how to approach an activity that naturally crosses edges.’

The licensing that is new will even require operators to give a legal rationale because of their operations in gray markets where they don’t hold licenses. These requirements have led some operators to choose to not apply for a UK license, though the majority of major companies plan to remain in the united kingdom market.

From Here to Eternity: The Massachusetts Casino Journey

The Wynn Resorts casino proposition in Everett is considered the most recent to win a license from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. (Image: Wynn Resorts Holdings)

Massachusetts casino certification law is back in the news in a way that is big week, as the Wynn Everett task won the Greater Boston casino license after having a contentious battle against a Mohegan Sun proposal. That decision, which was reached by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission in a 3-1 vote, sets the phase for Steve Wynn to create their big resort in Everett, on the site of the former Monsanto plant in the outskirts of Boston.

But it is additionally the culmination of more than three years of guidelines, votes, debates and referendums, every one of which combine to write the whole tale of Massachusetts’ casino gambling law. If you’re unknown with what are you doing in the state, here’s a quick recap of everything you need to get up to speed.

How It All Started

On November 22, 2011, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the Gaming that is expanded Act. This bill allowed for four gambling that is new to be built within the state: three gambling enterprises and one slots parlor. Every one of the three casino licenses was tied to a specific region: one for Western Massachusetts, one for the Greater Boston area, and one for Southeastern Massachusetts. The slots parlor could anywhere be built in the state.

Designers who wished to apply for starters of the four licenses were needed to go through an application that is extensive, one that included mandatory referendums by regional communities where casino proposals were made.

Those referendums ended up being a critical part of the licensing process, as several promising tasks didn’t earn the approval of voters. Such as, a plan for a casino at Suffolk Downs in East Boston was scuttled when votes overwhelmingly rejected the proposal, which eventually led to that particular plan being resurrected on the Revere side of the Suffolk Downs racetrack.

Finally, the choice of whether to award licenses and to whom they need to go was determined by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, a five-member panel that oversaw the licensing process that is entire.

And the Award Goes To…

In late February, the first license was awarded to Penn National Gaming, which earned the right to create a slots parlor in Plainville. That plan had been plumped for over a Massachusetts Live! proposal in Leominster and a Raynham Park option that did not prove popular using the commission. Fundamentally, the payment voted 3-2 in favor of the Penn nationwide plan over the Leominster alternative.

In June, the payment then approved MGM Resorts International for the Western Massachusetts casino license. The payment voted unanimously and only awarding the license to your proposed MGM resort in Springfield, which emerged because the only contender in the region.

This the gaming commission also awarded the Greater Boston casino license to a Wynn Resorts project in Everett week. The Wynn plan had been selected over a Mohegan Sun proposal in Revere by a 3-1 vote, with gaming commission Chairman Stephen Crosby recusing himself through the process.

Southeastern Massachusetts License Still to Be Decided

So far, few contenders that are serious emerged for the Southeastern Massachusetts casino license, which caused the video gaming commission to push back the deadline for applications from September 30, 2014 to December 1 of this year. The spot’s schedule was already behind the rest of the continuing state due to the possibility that the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe might create a casino in Taunton. When that effort felt through, the location was opened up to designers.

So far, just KG Urban has applied to construct in your community, although the commission believes that other candidates who were refused in one other two parts of the continuing state may take to once again in Southeastern Massachusetts.

Casino Law Repeal Nevertheless a chance

There continues to be the opportunity that all of these venues may never open. There is significant opposition to permitting casinos in Massachusetts since the law was first signed, and who has culminated in casino opponents obtaining a question on a statewide ballot this November that may ask voters if they wish to repeal the casino law. Current polling shows that such a repeal is not likely, however: one September that is early poll UMass Lowell/7News found that 59 per cent of likely voters planed to vote against the repeal effort, with only 36 percent saying they would vote to repeal what the law states.



  1. この記事へのコメントはありません。

  1. この記事へのトラックバックはありません。